Clinical Investigation| Volume 364, ISSUE 1, P36-45, July 2022

Clinician attitudes and concordance with self-assessed and actual intravenous fluid prescribing patterns: A single-institution evaluation of survey and electronic prescribing data



      Recent studies suggest that balanced fluids improve inpatient outcomes compared to normal saline. The objective of this study was to obtain insights into clinicians’ knowledge, attitudes and perceived prescribing practices concerning IV isotonic fluids and to analyze perceived prescribing in the context of actual prescribing.


      This study, conducted at a single center (Medical University of South Carolina), included 1) a cross-sectional survey of physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) (7/2019-8/2019) and 2) review electronic health record (EHR) claims data (2/2018-1/2019) to quantify the prescribing patterns of isotonic fluids.


      Clinicians perceived ordering equivalent amounts of normal saline and balanced fluids although normal saline ordering predominated (59.7%). There was significant variation in perceived and actual ordering across specialties, with internal medicine/subspecialty and emergency medicine clinicians reporting preferential use of normal saline and surgical/subspecialty and anesthesia clinicians reporting preferential use of balanced fluids (p < 0.0001). Clinicians who self-reported providing care in an intensive care unit (ICU) reported more frequent use of balanced fluids than non-ICU clinicians (p = 0.03). Actual prescribing data mirrored these differences. Clinicians’ self-reported use of continuous infusions (p = 0.0006) and beliefs regarding the volume of fluid required to cause harm (p = 0.003) were also associated with self-reported differences in fluid prescribing. Clinician experience, most clinical considerations (e.g., indications, contraindications, barriers to using a specific fluid), and fluid cost were not associated with differential prescribing.


      Persistent normal saline utilization is associated with certain specialties, care locations, and the rate and volume of fluid administered, but not with other clinical considerations or cost. These findings can guide interventions to improve evidence-based fluid prescribing.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to The American Journal of the Medical Sciences
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Glassford NJ
        • Bellomo R.
        The complexities of intravenous fluid research: questions of scale, volume, and accumulation.
        Korean J Crit Care Med. 2016; 31: 276-299
      1. 2017 AHA Annual Survey 2022

        • Boer C
        • Bossers SM
        • Koning NJ.
        Choice of fluid type: physiological concepts and perioperative indications.
        Br J Anaesth. 2018; 120: 384-396
        • Powell AG
        • Paterson-brown S.
        Safety through education. FY1 doctors still poor in prescribing intravenous fluids.
        BMJ. 2011; 342: d2741
        • Lobo DN
        • Dube MG
        • Neal KR
        • et al.
        Problems with solutions: drowning in the brine of an inadequate knowledge base.
        Clin Nutr. 2001; 20: 125-130
        • Lupi MM
        • Maweni RM
        • Shirazi S
        • et al.
        Fluid and electrolyte balance-establishing the knowledge base of Foundation Year One doctors.
        Ir J Med Sci. 2019; 188: 1047-1055
        • Powell AG
        • Paterson-Brown S
        • Drummond GB.
        Undergraduate medical textbooks do not provide adequate information on intravenous fluid therapy: a systematic survey and suggestions for improvement.
        BMC Medical Educ. 2014; 14: 35
        • Chawla G
        • Drummond GB.
        Textbook coverage of a common topic: fluid management of patients after surgery.
        Med Educ. 2008; 42: 613-618
        • Mccloskey M
        • Maxwell P
        • Gormley G.
        Learning fluid prescription skills: why is it so challenging?.
        Clin Teach. 2015; 12: 250-254
        • Ramsay G
        • Baggaley A
        • Vaughan Shaw PG
        • et al.
        Variability in the prescribing of intravenous fluids: a cross sectional multicentre analysis of clinical practice.
        Int J Surg. 2018; 51: 199-204
        • Scott N
        • Squibbs J
        • Lake A
        • et al.
        Risks of intravenous fluid therapy by first year residents—a prospective study.
        Br J Med Med Res. 2016; 15: 1-13
        • Hammond NE
        • Taylor C
        • Finfer S
        • et al.
        Patterns of intravenous fluid resuscitation use in adult intensive care patients between 2007 and 2014: An international cross-sectional study.
        PLoS ONE. 2017; 12e0176292
        • Finfer S
        • Liu B
        • Taylor C
        • et al.
        Resuscitation fluid use in critically ill adults: an international cross-sectional study in 391 intensive care units.
        Crit Care. 2010; 14: R185
        • Lira
        • Pinsky
        Choices in fluid type and volume during resuscitation: impact on patient outcomes.
        Ann Intensive Care. 2014; 4: 38
        • Semler MW
        • Self WH
        • Wanderer JP
        • et al.
        Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 829-839
        • Self WH
        • Semler MW
        • Wanderer JP
        • et al.
        Balanced crystalloids versus saline in noncritically ill adults.
        N Engl J Med. 2018; 378: 819-828
        • Brown RM
        • Wang L
        • Coston TD
        • et al.
        Balanced crystalloids versus saline in sepsis: a secondary analysis of the SMART trial.
        Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;
        • Benchimol EI
        • Smeeth L
        • Guttmann A
        • et al.
        The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement.
        PLoS Med. 2015; 12 (Published 2015 Oct 6)e1001885
        • Aday LA
        • Cornelius LJ.
        Designing and Conducting Health Surveys, A Comprehensive Guide.
        John Wiley & Sons, 2011
        • Cunningham CT
        • Quan H
        • Hemmelgarn B
        • et al.
        Exploring physician specialist response rates to web-based surveys.
        BMC Med Res Methodol. 2015; 15: 32
        • Kellerman SE
        • Herold J.
        Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature.
        Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 61-67
        • DiStefano C
        • Shi D
        • Morgan GB.
        Collapsing categories is often more advantageous than modeling sparse data: investigations in the CFA framework.
        Struct Equ Model. 2020; : 1-13
        • O'Malley CM
        • Frumento RJ
        • Hardy MA
        • et al.
        A randomized, double-blind comparison of lactated Ringer's solution and 0.9% NaCl during renal transplantation.
        Anesth Analg. 2005; 100: 1518-1524
        • Khajavi MR
        • Etezadi F
        • Moharari RS
        • et al.
        Effects of normal saline vs. lactated ringer's during renal transplantation.
        Ren Fail. 2008; 30: 535-539
        • Modi MP
        • Vora KS
        • Parikh GP
        • et al.
        A comparative study of impact of infusion of Ringer's Lactate solution versus normal saline on acid-base balance and serum electrolytes during live related renal transplantation.
        Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl. 2012; 23: 135-137
        • Weinberg L
        • Harris L
        • Bellomo R
        • et al.
        Effects of intraoperative and early postoperative normal saline or Plasma-Lyte 148® on hyperkalaemia in deceased donor renal transplantation: a double-blind randomized trial.
        Br J Anaesth. 2017; 119: 606-615
        • Powell-Tuck J
        • Gosling P
        • Lobo DN
        • et al.
        British Consensus Guidelines on Intravenous Fluid Therapy for Adult Surgical Patients (GIFTASUP).
        NHS National Library of Health, London2011
        • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence
        Intravenous Fluid Therapy in Adults: Clinical Guideline.
        National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, London2013
        • Zampieri FG
        • Machado FR
        • Biondi RS
        • et al.
        Effect of intravenous fluid treatment with a balanced solution vs 0.9% saline solution on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS Randomized Clinical Trial.
        JAMA. 2021; 326: 1-12